WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Trump lawyers and prosecutors spar over evidence in classified documents case
VOX POPULI: Ippei Mizuhara’s interpretation skills make the news even sadder
HK must remain vigilant against 'soft resistance'
Good News: Stories that cheered us up for the week of 1
Stanford, UCLA to meet for NCAA title in women's golf
Petrobras paid BRL 240.2 bi in taxes and royalties in 2023
New Zealand being considered as potential AUKUS Pillar Two partner
Parents of Michigan school shooter sentenced to up to 15 years in prison
Over 1 million claims related to toxic exposure granted under new veterans law, Biden announces
Fake priest arrested for stealing from churches across the U.S.
A Minnesota city will rewrite an anti
O.J. Simpson, acquitted murder defendant and football star, dies at age 76